Hiroshima Nagasaki Fake Nuclear Bomb Scam


Now that we have recently seen the huge mushroom cloud from the incandescent M.O.A.B. bomb that US forces dropped onto Afghanistan, that cloud looking highly similar to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki clouds by the end of WW2, we could rethink the writings about the “Kodak Bomb” that have disappeared later on.

Nowadays, we live in a virtual world where people tend to take anything for real and true, without the slightest effort to analyze or verify what’s been presented. People live with the idea that if large websites with many moderators and lots of followers and likes and links tell you something, then it must be true. Examples: wikipedia, about, and youtube.

In the following article, the term “aerial bomb” means a bomb that can be dropped from an airplane in the air, and the term “ground bomb” means a bomb that cannot be dropped from an airplane in the air, only to be detonated on the ground.

Roughlyy 50 years later, a reassessment of the radiation exposures at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was completed in 2003 for publication as the “new dosimetry” or the “DS02” and came to my eyes in this year 2005.

The exposure from radio-active fallout was “small at Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the bombs exploded approx 500 meters AGL”, so there was little ejecta of radionuclides. A strange mention in the report. People within a radius of 2.5 to 10 kilometers of the bombings had little or no exposure, according to the report. At the moment of explosion, a blue-white flash of light – similar to that of magnesium flash lights used for photographic purposes – was eye witnessed by many people. There was a heat blast similar to napalm, very much comparable to the napalm bombings in Vietnam where similar paper & bamboo mansions caught fire and got swept away. There was no sign of “glass-like” substance due to nuclear heat, nor was there any fall-out. No plasma in the sky whatsoever. There was radio-active matter involved, but not as a result of a nuclear chain reaction, rather as a dispersal of nuclear trash through conventional chemical based explosion. No one explained why the bomber crew had to perform meticulous precision targeting just like conventional bombers would do. A real nuke half a mile off is really no big deal. No one explained how the pilot could keep controlling his plane despite of the pressure waves from the explosion in mid-air. Unless the pressure waves were completely absent. And no one ever explained how the pilot of the bomber could escape the EMP wave yet keep flying that slow airplane. Unless there was no EMP at all.

It would take a fast plane such as a jet to escape from the EMP range in time. A sloppy B-29 prop, no way.

Of course half of the city got flattened. Countless photographs show the ruins. What do you expect from houses made of wood and paper? No big deal to wipe them off. Any bomb could do the job that easily. A real nuclear blast, however, would not have left ruins at all. The city would have been absolutely flat. The nuclear storm would have blown away everything. And that is not what really happened.

The Trinity ground bomb tests showed a totally different scenario. The light was not blue-white like magnesium fire, but white at first, then orange-red plasma as seen on many photo pictures. Short shake, to speak in old terms. The pressure wave was not a single blast but rather a series of concentric outgoing forces. The sound was a rumble rather than a bang. The heat blast was dense. And there was a lot of EMP. All typical for a real thermo-nuclear bomb. Moreover, at the epicenter a crater was formed with crystallized silicon, the “glass-like” substance also referred to as “jade”. That “jade” can only be formed at extreme high temperatures comparable with the surface of the sun. There was a fall-out after as well, typical characteristics of a potential nuclear winter.

What is interesting is that nearly all web based references, such as wikipedia, show similar (copy/pasted) “birth dates” of the atomic bomb, that is 1945. According to some typewritten references from counter intel reports back in the ’60s and ’70s, there was not yet an aerial atomic bomb in 1945. At least not one that a B-29 could handle. So even if 1945 is correct, then it applies to a ground bomb, not an aerial bomb. That’s why some scientists came up with the term “Kodak Bomb” as to compare the technical working with a Kodak flash light based on magnesium combustion. Such aerial bombs were of the type RDD, “radiological dispersion devices”, an academic word for “dirty bombs”. Of course the looks of a nuclear explosion could be easily predicted as to be able to make the Kodak explosions look “real nuclear”.

It is “officially documented” that two distinct atomic bombs were used onto Japan. Hiroshima received a 15 kt U235 bomb, and Nagasaki a 21 kt Pu239 bomb. That is what the records say.

What is not emphasized is that these nukes operated at only 10 to 20 percent, which was the nominal capacity at that time. So their destructive effectiveness would be only 10 to 20 percent. That basically justifies the amount of damage to the paper homes. Interesting fact is that the documents state that both bombs exploded at an altitude of 500 meters AGL. At such altitude, there is a different type of energy dispersion and fall-out than at ground level. Ground level explosions would have been more effective in terms of shock wave blast and fall-out. The documents never explained why the bombs had to explode at 500 meter AGL. This is very strange and completely inconsistent with the military objectives. Unless large mushroom clouds must be formed and the bombs were indeed Kodak Bombs, in which case a minimum of a few hundred meters AGL would be required for the desired light, heat and cloud effects.

The interesting fact is that for a U235 bomb an enrichment process is needed to level U up to 90%. For this process a complete nuclear facility is needed, plus that specific technology. It takes several years to produce enriched elements sufficient to reach the minimum required mass of a nuclear bomb. To produce bomb grade Pu, same thing, but even more complex. A 20 MWt or 5 MWe reactor is needed to produce maximum one aerial bomb per year. It was only in 1957 that the US had its first nuclear electric power plant for civil purposes. The former USSR followed exactly one year later.

The atomic bomb became operational by the USSR in 1949, Britain in 1952, France in 1960, China in 1964. It is not clearly documented whether these were aerial or ground type bombs, prototypes or operational units.

Reactor orders in the US started only early 1950’s according to the stats. Of course, any military would say: “bombs first, then reactors”. So that 1950 timeline could confirm the 1945 event. But if it could, then how come that the Sovjets had their bomb only in 1949? Normally they should never be more than a year off, which means for the US 1948 as first aerial detonation day. Not 1945 for aerial bomb types, only ground bomb types perhaps. A reactor is always needed to produce enriched elements for an atomic bomb.

The Trinity bomb may or may not have been exploded in 1945 or some year(s) later. Suppose it did, then it was certainly the ground bomb type. The confusion (read: lie) that was born is that it was assumed that therefore the aerial bomb also came into existence.

Comparing the 6.1 kg Pu 239 Trinity bomb of 18.6 kt and the chemical incandescent Kodak Bomb, the differences are obvious.

It can be concluded that the US offered to Japan to surrender without having to lose their face according to the Japanese bushido (the way of code of honor of the samurai), by agreeing in taking part of a show down of some fake nuclear bombings, a gentle way to spare a great number of civilian lives while preserving the level of honor for the Japanese.

The Japanese Govt did so. And in exchange for the US on their curriculum vitae the “possession of an atomic bomb” as to scare off the Soviets. The Americans never dropped a real nuke onto Japan. They did not have any. The bombings on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were faked. Yes, 100,000 Japanese civilians did get cancer over the years. But that was the result of the radiological dispersion technology used in the Kodak bombs. None of the cancer reports stated what kind of isotopes were measured. That is sloppy forensic analysis.

If indeed the US had an operational aerial nuclear bomb in 1945, then why wasn’t that one used against Hitler? Wasn’t the German situation much worse than the Japanese situation? The answer is simple. The Germans would never play the fake samurai bushido game, neither had the US any real nuclear aerial bomb in the first place. Why send an expensive and complex allied army over West Europe to Germany if one single real (!) atomic bomb could have done the job? It doesn’t make sense. Unless there was no aerial atomic bomb in 1945 available. The dates just don’t add-up.

When you look carefully at the Trinity photos, you will notice that the atmospheric scene (read: clouds etc.) is totally different from those over Japan. The mushroom clouds over Japan were clearly grey and cold, as expected from incandescent detonation, whereas Trinity showed something quite different.

It should not be forgotten that an aerial nuclear bomb must be fully contained, i.e. all the electrical power, logics, electronics, (super-)conductors, detonators, stabilizers, gyroscopes, and what have you. Also, an aerial nuclear bomb must be a little more stable, as far as the nuclear explosives is concerned because of the movements during free-fall, thus requiring different detonation parameters, so its overall structure and content is different from a ground bomb. In other words, a self-contained nuclear aerial bomb cannot be a carbon copy of a ground bomb. It is a whole different technology. So you just cannot take the Trinity ground bomb, put a car battery and a remote control in there, stash it in a B-29 cargo bay, take-off and drop it over the target and push the remote start button at 500 AGL. It is not that simple at all. That is just the kind of fantasy that wikipedia and cinema movies continue to incorporate as facts.

And in the 1940’s any bomb technology was very far from what we have today 70 years later. We also should analyze the whole thing with the mind-set of at least half a century ago.

Of course there were always “witnesses” who survived one or two bombs and very happy to receive a bag of money in exchange for their nuclear sightseeing details. They had to shut up about what really happened. False testimonies always go hand in hand with cover-ups.

To all who do not believe that history cannot be covered-up to the extent that not a single public reference proves the contrary, go look at all False Flag operations in the past, and some contemporary cases, such as the real identity of Obama, the real reason of war on Iraq, the real whereabouts of Saddam, the real CO2 and global warming issue, and so forth. It is a mess, all that historical information. The bad thing is that several movie makers keep on producing “historical” movies and make the audience believe that these were the facts. Examples are Pearl Harbor, Schindlers List, JFK, Diana, From The Earth To The Moon, The Ten Commandments, and so on. Not only the wikis are crammed with lies and false data, even the news media are liars which is proven by the public video “Hollywood Pentagon Liaison” that clearly shows how war news is fabricated in open air movie studios.

We are taught lies every day again. Don’t blindly believe what I told you about the fake nukes, and don’t trust virtual information (re)sources just like that either. Same for the Moon landing and a lot of other “historical facts”. Just think for yourself, what makes sense and what does not. And stop believing that wikipedia is the all-knowing God. A little more awareness, and the world looks different.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *